Colombia can win at the desk! The illegal action Brazil took that no one noticed

The match between Brazil and Colombia at the Mané Garrincha stadium not only left emotions on the pitch, but also a controversy that has sparked debate throughout the football world. According to Gol Caracol, Brazil made seven substitutions during the match, exceeding the permitted limit of six substitutions. However, the Brazilian national team could argue that one of the substitutions was due to a concussion, which would justify the additional substitution.

The controversy centers on Gerson's substitution. Brazil could argue that the player suffered a concussion and that, therefore, the additional substitution would be within the limits allowed by the regulations. In the case of a concussion, teams can make additional substitutions without affecting the limit of permitted substitutions.

Rules and Concussion: A Gray Area in Football

Football regulations allow for additional substitutions in the case of a concussion. However, the interpretation of this rule can be controversial. How is it determined whether a player has suffered a concussion? Who makes the final decision?

The lack of clarity in the rules creates a gray area that teams can exploit to make additional substitutions. In Brazil's case, the national team could argue that Gerson suffered a concussion and that the additional substitution would therefore be justified.

Another point of controversy is the substitution of Alisson Becker. Although it was reported that the substitution was due to a concussion, some question whether this decision was a strategic one to make an additional substitution.

The rules allow for additional changes in the case of a concussion, but the interpretation of this rule can raise questions. How is it determined whether a player has suffered a concussion? Who makes the final decision?

Brazil's seven substitutions could have given the home team an advantage. Having more fresh players on the field would have given Brazil greater physical capacity to face the final minutes of the match.

However, it's also important to keep in mind that substitutions can affect the pace of play and team cohesion. Making seven changes could have created disarray in Brazil's tactical system.

Colombia's Reaction: Protest or Acceptance?

The Colombian national team could file a protest with FIFA over Brazil's seven substitutions . However, the final decision will depend on the interpretation of the regulations and the evidence Brazil presents to justify the addition

Should Colombia lodge a protest, FIFA will review the case and make a decision. The final decision could impact the outcome of the match and the standings for the South American Qualifiers.

The controversy surrounding Brazil's substitutions has sparked a debate in the football world. Some question the lack of transparency in the interpretation of the rules, while others defend Brazil's strategy to make an additional change.

The controversy highlights the need to clarify the rules regarding concussion substitutions. The lack of clarity in the rules creates uncertainty and can be exploited by teams to gain an advantage.

The Future of the Rules: Changes to Avoid Controversy?

The controversy surrounding Brazil's substitutions could lead to changes in football regulations. FIFA could clarify the rule regarding concussion substitutions to avoid future controversies.

Transparency and clarity in the regulations are essential to ensuring a level playing field in football. The controversy surrounding Brazil's changes is a wake-up call for FIFA, which must take measures to prevent similar situations from happening again in the future.