News

What Lee Carsley said about Bellingham and what might interest Carlos Ancelotti

The experimental approach backfires as England falls to Greece, marking their first home loss in four years.

By Sebastián Hernadez

Lee Carsley and Bellingham. Photo: England networks.
Lee Carsley and Bellingham. Photo: England networks.
Síguenos enSíguenos en Google News

England endured a 2-1 defeat against Greece at Wembley, a result that broke their four-year unbeaten home streak and dealt a significant blow to interim manager Lee Carsley's bid for a full-time coaching position. Carsley, who had opted for a bold and unconventional lineup, faced criticism for fielding a side that lacked a true striker, a decision that left England struggling to create meaningful chances throughout the match.

Sky Sports analysts pointed out the flaws in the experimental lineup, noting that while Carsley had hoped to inject a more attacking mindset, the result was a largely ineffective performance. With only two shots on target, both coming from Jude Bellingham, England's offense looked disjointed against a Greek side ranked 48th in the world. The defeat may serve as a painful lesson for Carsley, highlighting the dangers of relying too heavily on talent without balance.

Carsley’s Risky Tactical Choices Under Scrutiny

The defeat highlighted the risks of Carsley's approach, especially with the Euro 2024 tournament looming. His decision to start the likes of Cole Palmer, Phil Foden, Bukayo Saka, Anthony Gordon, and Bellingham raised eyebrows, particularly given that this group had little experience playing together. Critics questioned the wisdom of such an experimental setup in a competitive match. Despite his attempt to break away from Gareth Southgate’s more conservative tactics, Carsley’s gamble did not pay off, as England’s attack struggled to find its rhythm and cohesion.

View post on Instagram
 

Notably, the decision to field Bellingham as a false nine backfired, especially with in-form strikers Ollie Watkins and Dominic Solanke left on the bench. Carsley’s gamble on playing without a dedicated striker, coupled with Harry Kane’s absence, left England short of creative solutions up front, and Greece took full advantage with quick counterattacks that ultimately secured their victory.

Carsley Defends Decision to Play Bellingham as False Nine

In the aftermath of the loss, Carsley defended his tactical choices, particularly the decision to use Bellingham as a false nine. “Jude has a lot of attributes of a nine and a ten. He makes great runs, and we thought we could get more options going forward by using him there,” said Carsley. He also acknowledged that this match was an opportunity to explore other attacking options, given the team's wealth of creative midfielders. "It's one of the challenges we have, with three or four very capable number tens," Carsley explained, reflecting on the team’s lack of balance in key areas.

  • Tactical Experiment: Carsley’s decision to field an offensive lineup without a dedicated striker, with Jude Bellingham as a false nine, was met with criticism after England’s lackluster performance.
  • Lack of Creativity: Despite fielding five attacking players, England managed only two shots on target, both by Bellingham, highlighting the team's struggles to break down Greece’s defense.
  • Defensive Issues: England’s defense left gaps that allowed Greece to capitalize on counterattacks, leading to a historic victory for the visitors at Wembley.
  • Managerial Challenge: Carsley’s experimental tactics, designed to showcase England’s attacking talent, may have hindered his chances of becoming the full-time head coach, as his lineup lacked balance and cohesion.

More news