América would not be involved; the reason why the Eagles would be exempt from the Azcárraga investigation

Club América, one of Mexico's most popular and successful soccer teams, has managed to remain unscathed amid the ongoing investigation into its owner, Emilio Azcárraga Jean, and his alleged involvement in the FIFA corruption scandal.

The FIFA corruption scandal, which rocked the global soccer community in 2015, revealed a widespread network of bribery and corruption within the organization. Several high-ranking FIFA officials were indicted on charges of racketeering, money laundering, and wire fraud. Among those caught up in the scandal was Emilio Azcárraga Jean, who was accused of being involved in a bribery scheme to secure lucrative broadcasting rights for the FIFA World Cup.

While the allegations against Azcárraga are serious, Club América, which is owned by Televisa, a media conglomerate controlled by Azcárraga, has managed to avoid any direct consequences from the investigation. This has led to questions about why the club has been able to remain untouched while its owner faces serious legal troubles.

The Corporate Structure

The key to understanding why Club América is exempt from the investigation lies in the corporate structure of Televisa and its subsidiaries. Televisa is a massive media conglomerate with interests in television, radio, publishing, and sports. Club América is just one small part of this vast empire.

Legally, Club América is a separate entity from Televisa. While Azcárraga is the controlling shareholder of both companies, the day-to-day operations of the club are managed by a separate board of directors. This corporate structure creates a legal firewall between the club and its owner, which has allowed América to continue operating as normal, even as Azcárraga faces legal challenges.

Implications for the Club

The fact that Club América has been able to avoid the consequences of the FIFA scandal has had significant implications for the club. First, it has allowed América to maintain its status as one of the most powerful and influential teams in Mexican soccer. Second, it has protected the club's commercial interests, which include lucrative sponsorship deals and broadcasting rights.

However, there are also potential long-term risks for the club. If Azcárraga is found guilty of the charges against him, he may be forced to sell his stake in Televisa, including his ownership of Club América. This could lead to a change in ownership at the club, which could have a significant impact on the team's culture and direction.

Conclusion

The case of Club América demonstrates the complexities of corporate ownership in the world of sports. While the club has been able to avoid the direct consequences of the FIFA scandal, the long-term implications for the team remain uncertain. As the investigation into Emilio Azcárraga continues, it will be interesting to see how it ultimately affects the future of Club América.